Dependency & license provenance
The full dependency tree, copyleft exposure, and packages with no license at all.
For founders – raising, selling, or preparing for audit
Most founders find out what's wrong with their technology when a buyer tells them – mid-deal, with no time to react. A two-week, fixed-fee assessment surfaces it while you can still act, and shows where your technology is worth more than you're letting on.
The problem
Most founders find out what's wrong with their technology when a buyer tells them – mid-deal, with no time to react.
51% of investment bankers now say technology is the single most burdensome element of the entire diligence review – ahead of financial, legal, and commercial. Three years ago that figure was 31%.
I've been on the receiving end of it. When my company went through diligence, the investor's team asked for a full inventory of our third-party dependencies and open-source licenses. Nobody had ever compiled one. Then they asked what our security risks were and what we'd done about them. We had good answers – we had just never written any of them down.
None of it killed the deal. All of it landed on me personally, in the worst possible three weeks, because diligence runs need-to-know and there was nobody I could hand it to. Twelve months out, that work can be scoped and delegated calmly. Once a deal is live, it can't.
What gets examined
The full dependency tree, copyleft exposure, and packages with no license at all.
Single points of failure, vendor and integration lock-in, cloud-cost efficiency, and what it would actually cost to move.
Not whether you're secure – whether you can prove it, from access control to data governance.
Uptime, monitoring, and whether a restore has ever actually been tested.
Bus factor, computed from your commit history rather than from interviews.
Contractor assignment, open-source contributions, and AI-generated code.
Whether the roadmap you're selling is supported by your actual throughput.
Whether the system can take the 5–10× growth your deck promises – proven under load, not asserted.
How findings are sorted
Every finding is sorted by what you can still do about it. That sorting is most of the value – it's why founders either panic or do nothing when handed an undifferentiated list.
Find
Unknown
You'd never inventoried it. You couldn't have fixed what nobody had looked at.
Fix
Known but undocumented
You do this correctly and can't prove it. Cheapest to close, and the most common.
Frame
Known but unfixable
Real, understood, too expensive to reverse before the event. You need an answer, not a fix.
Not sure where you'd land? Take the free 3-minute self-check →
The assessment
Fixed scope, mostly asynchronous – about 90 minutes of your team's time, and no drawn-out sales process. You get a single report plus a 60-minute walkthrough.
Book a readiness call →Is this for you?
After the assessment
The assessment ends with a 90-day plan. Some founders take it from there; others want the same judgment on a continuing basis – as ongoing advisory, or an embedded fractional CTO through the raise or integration itself. That's the other half of what I do.
Operating & fractional →Who's behind it
Most advisors have read a diligence report. I've received them, run them, and then run the acquired companies afterward – so I know both what diligence catches and what only surfaces in year two.
2012 – Founding
Co-founded Gather, an event-management platform for restaurants and venues. Led product and engineering; scaled it to $10M ARR and roughly 110 people.
2017 – Capital
Gather took a strategic investment from Vista Equity Partners, followed by Enlightened Hospitality Investments – capital and partnership to accelerate the platform.
2020 – Platform leadership
Gather merged with Tripleseat. As VP Engineering and then General Manager, helped grow ARR from $20M to $60M+, took the platform to SOC 2 and PCI compliance at 99.99% uptime, and built payments into a profit center.
2023–25 – Integration
Served as GM across EventUp, Attendease, and Merri – owning post-acquisition integration and P&L for each line. This work ran through General Atlantic's majority stake at a reported ~$500M valuation.
Two weeks, $5,000, and a clear-eyed view of your technical position while there's still time to act on it. The best engagements start with a short conversation.
Book a readiness call →Prefer email? tom@ampeer.com